Better gender balance at latest MHacks hackathon

Topics:

Wearing a Google Glass, Keeley Erhardt sits with her teammates in front of a window on which they’ve scrawled ideas in red dry-erase marker.

All around her in the atrium of the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science building, laptops abound. Some students focus on their screens. Others doze in beanbag chairs. A pair is playing a beanbag toss game.

It’s Saturday evening at MHacks, about 20 hours into the 36-hour race to make something cool.

This is the seventh time U-M students have led the organization of this hackathon, which draws students from across the country and at one point swelled to the nation’s largest at a university. But this time, in several important ways, MHacks is different.

One of the more striking shifts: There are a lot more women around.

Amy Hu, Heather Jacqueline, and Arshia Mufti celebrate their group’s hack, Baylexa, a smarthome application that gives health recommendations based on ailments communicated by speaking to it. (Photo by Joseph Xu, College of Engineering)

“It’s easy to notice the change,” said Erhardt, a veteran hacker studying computer science at MIT. She and her co-ed team built a sort of life coach mobile app that involves either Google Glass or a smartphone and the Amazon Echo to motivate people to achieve their goals.

“A lot of times in tech, it’s really skewed,” she added. “But with a more balanced group, you get more of a diversity of ideas and user bases. A lot more interesting things come out.”

Organizers did this on purpose. For years, MHacks has drawn crowds of more than 1,200 to benevolently “hack” together new software, apps and even objects. It has brought in tens of thousands of dollars in prizes from high-profile sponsors. And it helped turn “hacking” into a veritable sport.

But MHacks leadership decided to aim for a welcoming experience this time, as a way to help broaden the ranks in tech. They worked to bring in more women and other underrepresented students, as well as more beginners. 

Rather than call this MHacks 7, they named it MHacks: Refactor — a nod to a programming term that refers to changing code without changing its external behavior.

“Right now there’s a serious problem with gender inequality in the tech industry,” said Shayna Mehta, director of logistics for MHacks, and an undergrad studying computer science in LSA.

“At MHacks, we wanted to create a more inclusive community, in terms of finding others like you there. I feel like we’ve helped nurture that feeling. We’ve made a significant culture change here.”

Organizers aimed for a 50-50 male-female gender balance, and they were able to achieve about 35 percent female. That’s a significant increase over the typical maximum of 20 percent women at MHacks and other large collegiate hackathons. In order to achieve that level of female participation, organizers advertised their goal in advance, as a way to get more women to apply and let everyone know how serious they were.

Also this year, they upped the mentor-to-student ratio to 4 to 1. And to foster the inclusive feel, they kept the hackathon smaller, at 600 students.

Xyla Foxin demonstrates her group’s hack, Sing Me A Dress, an LED dress that responds to Disney songs. (Photo by Joseph Xu, College of Engineering)

Three of those students came up with a dress that lights up when someone sings a Disney princess’s trademark song. The outfit identifies the tune and turns the same color as the princess’s dress.

“You go from a Disney-loving karaoker to a glowing princess in five seconds or less,” said Gita Kaw, an undergraduate at Case Western Reserve University. “The lyrics are searched through our program and databases to emulate the princess that you’re singing about.”

Team Sing Me a Dress took home one of the hackathon’s top prizes.

MHacks: Refactor was presented by the Center for Entrepreneurship at the College of Engineering.

Tags:

Comments

  1. D W
    on February 23, 2016 at 1:12 pm

    Except that the math doesn’t add up. If you previously had 1200 people attending and 20% are women that equals 240 women. If you now have 600 people and 35% of them are women that equals 210 women. So how does that equate to: “There are a lot more women around”??

    Amazing that a public funded university can get away with gender discrimination and there aren’t any repercussions. Maybe the 600 guys that were turned away would have liked a shot at winning a prize or creating something great?

  2. Gene Chorba
    on February 23, 2016 at 7:45 pm

    As a competitor with 2 female team members that won a prize. Where did the women hide? I saw less women at mhacks then I have at any hackathon this year.

  3. Katharyn Cochrane
    on March 2, 2016 at 10:18 am

    As a female who grew up with computers, an educator, and the mother of a technologically-inclined daughter I feel strongly that the emphasis needs to be on keeping expectations for females high (on par with expectations of males) in STEM subjects, with perhaps some sociology initiatives to counteract any “STEM is for guys” stereotypes. I do NOT feel that gender-based quota systems (which discriminate against males and may reduce the standards for women) do women, men, or the public at large any benefits.

    Give us a level playing field, high expectations, and the benefit of the doubt, and may the best PERSON win!

  4. Paul DeCarlo
    on March 2, 2016 at 2:35 pm

    Equity far above excellence: one of the many mottos of today’s misguided university. One can only hope that the sons of those in charge pay a price.

  5. Nicole Moore
    on March 4, 2016 at 1:41 am

    These students worked to model the tech world as it should be, and they should be applauded for their efforts.

Leave a comment

Commenting is closed for this article. Please read our comment guidelines for more information.